Frame the question
Define what needs deciding, what evidence matters and the constraints the panel must respect.
Imagine eight different AI perspectives testing one decision: independent proposals, direct critiques, evidence gaps and a report that keeps opposing views visible. Explore the scripted experience today while live model connections are being developed.

What would we need to verify demand, constraints and existing alternatives?

Identify implementation risks, unknown dependencies and a low-cost proof of concept.

What do customers already use, and why would they pay to switch?
Start from independent perspectives before anyone influences the discussion. This illustration is scripted and is not live AI research.








Instead of comparing separate AI answers by hand, the planned system runs one shared brief through independent perspectives, critique and an auditable decision process. The preview currently demonstrates the workflow using scripted content.
Define what needs deciding, what evidence matters and the constraints the panel must respect.
Choose named AI collaborators, all able to contribute across every part of the meeting; live connections are not yet active.
Follow an illustrative debate in the current demo; the live system is being built to examine competing claims and evidence.
Inspect an example report with a proposed direction, objections, unknowns and a practical next test.
Available today: configure a sample room, explore scripted discussions, inspect an illustrative report and export a local transcript. No live AI service is called.
Try the workflowChoose an example. See the kind of challenge, minority objection and next test AI Meeting Room is being designed to keep in the final report.
Build the complete feature set to show customers a polished product.
What evidence says buyers need every feature, or will pay for the solution?
Start with a focused workflow pilot and test genuine customer interest before expanding the build.
A fuller prototype might still be necessary if integrations determine whether the workflow can deliver value.
No customer interviews, confirmed purchasing interest or reliable implementation estimates were supplied.
Interview potential buyers, test a clickable core workflow and document the reasons people decline.
All content in this example is invented to demonstrate report structure. It is not a result of actual multi-AI discussion or verified external evidence.
Try this question in the guided demoThe following capabilities define the intended live platform. They are not active AI integrations in the current prototype.
Give eight independent AI collaborators the same question and see where their approaches align or diverge—in one intended workspace.
Planned evidence references and explicit unknowns will help separate researched claims from assumptions and confident guesses.
A structured peer-critique workflow is being developed to challenge feasibility, pricing, risks and hidden trade-offs.
The intended report preserves the preferred option, minority objections, evidence gaps and the next decision to make.
Session limits and per-call reservations are built into the backend foundation; live billing and reconciliation are not enabled yet.
Model votes will inform the report, not take action on your behalf. Sensitive actions and deployments will require approval.
Choose the kind of decision you need to pressure-test. The examples below are potential uses for the future live service, not claims about current research results.
Pressure-test ideas, compare positioning and uncover blind spots before committing resources.
Challenge technical choices, architectural trade-offs and proposed experiments.
Examine competing arguments and turn open questions into a clear investigation plan.
Secure provider credentials are part of the planned backend.
Per-meeting limits are planned before live API usage.
Critical external actions should never run without permission.
The current preview is free to explore. Commercial subscriptions and account registration aren't available yet, and we're not presenting speculative prices as real offers.
Test the interface, not the real AI service.
Planned commercial functionality, subject to development and testing.
Sign-up and checkout are not open yet.
We're distinguishing the current interactive preview from the future live AI service. Here's what you can expect today.
Not yet. The workspace currently contains an interactive guided demo with clearly labelled scripted content. Connecting live AI providers, research tools and the orchestration engine is a later development milestone.
You can open the current guided demonstration without connecting a paid model API. It runs locally in your browser. It is not a real AI meeting.
Yes. Select from the eight named AI collaborators in the demonstration. Each is a general-purpose participant. No AI service receives your input at this stage.
That is a core product goal. The intended live workflow is independent investigation, evidence-based critique, structured debate and a decision brief that retains meaningful disagreements.
Live integrations are not active. The plan is to use server-side secrets, defined budgets, permissions and human approval gates. The prototype only stores demo sessions in your browser, and browser storage should not be used for confidential information.
Commercial plans and pricing have not been announced. No paid subscription or checkout is active in the current prototype.
Set an agenda, select a demo panel and explore the research-to-decision workflow. No credentials, no checkout and no model calls.
Enter the meeting roomGuided simulation only · Live AI integration in development